Friday, February 18, 2011

Get the facts, before the attacks!

It's good news the an overflow crowd has forced the Right to Work (for less) meeting to be moved. 

Due to the number of attendees, we have moved the March 8th presentation on RTW in Missouri to the MU Student Union, Stotler I.  The Union is located on Hitt Street and parking is available in the Hitt Street Garage.  Anyone you see will be able to direct you to the Union building.  The presentation will begin at 6:00 PM.  If you have questions, please call 573-882-8358, or email me at whitesa@missouri.edu
  
Right to Work in Missouri 
Presented by the MU Labor Education Program, University of Missouri – Columbia 
Sponsored by the Mid-Missouri Labor Club 
Labor Education Program 
University of Missouri—Columbia 
Tuesday, March 8, 2011 
6:00-9:00 PM 


This session will consider the issue of Right-to-Work legislation in Missouri. The presentation will be based on Missouri-specific data and will include information on legal issues related to union security and RTW legislation, the current state of research on RTW, the likely impact of RTW on unions, union membership, wages, and working conditions, and the relationship between RTW, economic development, and job growth. 
No Charge with RSVP to 573-882-8358 by March 1, 2011 
Labor Education Program Phone: 573-882-8358 
MU Extension Division Fax: 573-884-5423 
University of Missouri-Columbia Labored@missouri.edu 
Heinkel Building Room 212 
Columbia, MO 65211-1341 
If you have any special needs as addressed by the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact 

On Wisconsin: Kinder Takes Strong Stand Against Working Families and Middle Class

If you had any doubts about what the agenda of a Governor Kinder (a cold shiver just ran down my spine) would be, this piece from the Fired Up! Missouri blog should clear it up.  Delicious?  He is just strange...but dangerous.



As the protests and governing crisis continue in WisconsinLt. Governor Peter Kinder has voiced his full support for the proposals and actions from Badger Governor Scott Walker, whowants to remove collective bargaining rights from nearly all state workers.
On Twitter tonight, Kinder called the situation in Wisconsin "delicious," and endorsed a call to "support" Walker. 


twitter.com.jpg

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Workers toppled a dictator in Egypt, but might be silenced in Wisconsin

By Harold Meyerson

Wednesday, February 16, 2011
In Egypt, workers are having a revolutionary February. In the United States, by contrast, February is shaping up as the cruelest month workers have known in decades.
The coup de grace that toppled Hosni Mubarak came after tens of thousands of Egyptian workers went on strike beginning last Tuesday. By Friday, when Egypt's military leaders apparently decided that unrest had reached the point where Mubarak had to go, the Egyptians who operate the Suez Canal and their fellow workers in steel, textile and bottling factories; in hospitals, museums and schools; and those who drive buses and trains had left their jobs to protest their conditions of employment and governance. AsJim Hoagland noted in The Post, Egypt was barreling down the path that Poland, East Germany and the Philippines had taken, the path where workers join student protesters in the streets and jointly sweep away an authoritarian regime. But even as workers were helping topple the regime in Cairo, one state government in particular was moving to topple workers' organizations here in the United States. Last Friday, Scott Walker, Wisconsin's new Republican governor, proposed
taking away most collective bargaining rights of public employees. Under his legislation, which has moved so swiftly through the newly Republican state legislature that it might come to a vote Thursday, the unions representing teachers, sanitation workers, doctors and nurses at public hospitals, and a host of other public employees, would lose the right to bargain over health coverage, pensions and other benefits. (To make his proposal more politically palatable, the governor exempted from his hit list the unions representing firefighters and police.) The only thing all other public-sector workers could bargain over would be their base wages, and given the fiscal restraints plaguing the states, that's hardly anything to bargain over at all.
You might think that Walker came to this extreme measure after negotiations with public-sector unions had reached an impasse. In fact, he hasn't held such discussions. "I don't have anything to negotiate," Walker told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel last week. To underscore just how accompli he considered his fait, he vowed to call in the National Guard if protesting workers walked off the job or disrupted state services.
It's a throwback to 19th-century America, when strikes were suppressed by force of arms. Or, come to think of it, to Mubarak's Egypt or communist Poland and East Germany.
Now, it's not as if our states don't have fiscal crises to address, and Walker insists that it's Wisconsin's empty till that has driven him to curtail workers' rights. But there are other options. Democratic governors such as California's Jerry Brown and New York's Andrew Cuomo have proposed scaling back public services, pay and benefits without going after workers' fundamental rights to bargain. The right to bargain is clearly a separate question. Newly elected Republican governors, however, may reach the same conclusion Walker did and use the recession-induced fiscal crisis to achieve a partisan political objective: removing unions, the most potent force in the Democrats' electoral operation, from the landscape. "If we just stop and cure the pension problem, we have not gone far enough," Steve Malanga of the Manhattan Institute's City Journal said at the Conservative Political Action Conference last weekend.
The real goal of the American right is to reduce public employee unions to the level of private-sector unions, which now represent fewer than 7 percent of American workers. Walker's proposal not only confines public-sector unions to annual bargaining over wage increases but restricts the increases for state employees to raises in the consumer price index and compels every such union to hold an annual membership vote to determine whether the union can continue to represent workers. It clearly intends to smash these unions altogether.
Which would yield what? Our unions have already been decimated in the private sector; the results are plain. Corporate profits are soaring, while domestic investment, wages and benefits (particularly at nonunion companies) are flat-lining at best. With nobody to bargain for workers, America increasingly is an economically stagnant, plutocratic utopia. Is everybody happy?
American conservatives often profess admiration for foreign workers' bravery in protesting and undermining authoritarian regimes. Letting workers exercise their rights at home, however, threatens to undermine some of our own regimes (the Republican ones particularly), and shouldn't be permitted. Now that Wisconsin's governor has given the Guard its marching orders, we can discern a new pattern of global repressive solidarity emerging - from the chastened pharaoh of the Middle East to the cheesehead pharaoh of the Middle West.
meyersonh@washpost.com

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Does Making Missouri More "Job Friendly" Always Require Screwing the Working Class?

The Riverfront Times asks the question of the decade for Missouri.  


The question above immediately comes to mind when considering a spate of "pro business" proposals currently being debated in Jefferson City.

One of the proposals would repeal Missouri's minimum wage law, allowing employers to pay low-wage employees even less. Another would make it 
easier to terminate employees. Also in the sights of Missouri legislators is an effort toeliminate the state income tax and replace it with a higher sales tax -- a move that allows poorer Missourians to shoulder more of the state's tax burden.

In every case, the stated goal of the proposals is that they would make Missouri more friendly to employers. Lara Granich, director of 
Missouri Jobs with Justice hears this tripe every few years when a legislator gets it in his mind to repeal Missouri's minimum wage law.
In 2006 every single county in Missouri and 76 percent of total voters approved Proposition B that set the state minimum wage at $6.50 (in '06 dollars) pegged to inflation. The law also stated that Missouri's minimum wage would not dip below the federal minimum wage law, which in 2009 jumped to $7.25 per hour. Today that's where Missouri's minimum wage now stands and will likely remain for several years while inflation remains low due to the recession.

Still, Rep. 
Jerry Nolte (R-Gladtone) and state Senator Jason Crowell (R-Cape Girardeau) worry about the day that Missouri's lowest-wage workers could earn more than the federal minimum. Both have sponsored bills that would permanently set Missouri's minimum wage at the federal level.

"We need to be about job creation," Nolte told the 
Columbia Daily Tribune last month. "That needs to be the fixed star that we are looking for." Nolte's bill could clear its committee this week and head to the house floor.

The legislation is being championed by a coalition of business groups -- including the St. Louis RCGA, Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Missouri's restaurant and grocers' associations -- upset with a 
half-dozen Missouri labor laws and organized under a campaign called "Fix the Six."

But as Granich with Missouri Jobs with Justice notes, the biggest gripes seem to be coming from corporate restaurant chains. Missouri law states that tipped employees must be paid half of the prevailing minimum wage (a.k.a. $3.63 per hour), which is more than the federal law for tipped employees of $2.13.

In 2006 
Darden Restaurants (owner of Red Lobster, Olive Garden, Longhorn Steakhouse)donated $25,000 to kill Proposition B. Individual McDonald's restaurants donated thousands more to the effort. Granich contends that many of these same chain restaurants are behind the current efforts to lower Missouri's minimum wage.

"This isn't pro-business," says Granich. "It's pro-corporate, allowing these chains to send more of their profits out of state." Granich adds that she has the support of the owners of St. Louis businesses like music outlet Vintage Vinyl and the 
Bleeding Deacon bar and restaurant, who've testified that their companies have not been impacted by Missouri's minimum wage. 

"Labor costs are not generally the primary expenditures, and don't cause restaurants to fail," wrote Bleeding Deacon owner, Michael McLaughlin, in a letter to legislators last month. "As an industry, we enjoy some of the lowest labor costs of any out there, and most owner/operators take advantage of paying workers the minimum wage allowed. This current rate is completely within the average accepted percentage of labor costs industry wide, and taking away wages that are already being paid seems like an accident waiting to happen, as people are already struggling to make ends meet at every level of the economic ladder."
Last month James Moody, a former state budget director for Gov. John Ashcroft, made a similar appeal for the working class when he analyzed one of the initiatives to do away with Missouri's income tax. Moody called the proposal "fiscally untenable" and warned that -- as written -- it allows Missouri's tax burden to "fall disproportionately on the lower-income and middle class population of the state."


Meanwhile, as the Post-Dispatch reports today the bill under consideration to ease firing restrictions would make it "virtually impossible for discriminated-against employees to bring cases to court" if they're fired unjustly. Democrats, employee and minority groups are opposed to the bill. As is the American Cancer Society, which fear the bill could give employers a convenient way to rid themselves of sick employees.


Lawmakers suggest that desperate times call for desperate measures. But in so doing, they seem to forget that Missouri isn't the only state with high unemployment. There's still this thing called the "Great Recession" that continues its stranglehold on the entire country. For pro-business groups like Fix the Six, the foul economic climate just could be their perfect storm. 


As Lara Granich, with Jobs with Justice, says of the effort to lower the minimum wage: "They're taking advantage of the current crisis to repeal an important victory for low-wage earners."