Friday, August 30, 2013

Fast Food Stikes Come to Como

Columbia workers joined workers in over 60 cities nationwide for rallies in support of striking fast food workers.   Workers have two demands, the one the media covered is a raise in the minimum wage to $15 an hour.   The demand for a union was missed by much of the media.

Read the Tribune article here: http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/local/local-workers-join-national-fast-food-wage-protest/article_b7f61610-10cc-11e3-b773-001a4bcf6878.html

KOMU coverage: http://www.komu.com/news/local-fast-food-workers-protest-low-wages/

The Columbia Missourian's coverage includes some nice pictures (see them all here http://www.columbiamissourian.com/a/165003/fast-food-workers-supporters-rally-in-columbia/).

 Fast-food workers, supporters rally in Columbia
Columbia Missourian
Thursday, August 29, 2013 | 6:46 p.m. CDT; updated 9:24 p.m. CDT, Thursday, August 29, 2013


Regina Guevara of the Laborers' International Union of North America Local 773 protests Thursday in front of the Hardee's on Providence Road with fast-food workers and other supporters to raise wages.   |  Kholood Eid

BY LANDON WOODROOF
COLUMBIA — Fast-food employees, workers' rights advocates and local religious leaders held rallies outside two local restaurants Thursday in support of a living wage and the right to unionize.

Chanting slogans and clutching signs, the protesters called for the establishment of a $15 minimum wage — about twice the Missouri minimum of $7.35. Similar protests were held across the country.


The first rally in Columbia was at 9:30 a.m. outside Hardee's at the corner of Providence and Locust streets. About 40 people gathered and directed their energy at the drivers of passing cars.

"We can't survive on $7.35! We can't survive on $7.35!" the crowd yelled. Every now and then, a driver would honk in presumed support, eliciting a cheer from those assembled.

"All those workers, all those fries, we need our wages super-sized!"

After a while, the group turned around and addressed the workers inside the Hardee's who had chosen not to join them.

"Come on out, we got your back! Come on out, we got your back!" they shouted.

There were no takers, although at one point two employees wearing headsets exited the Hardee's to look at what was happening. They smiled for a few seconds and walked back in.

The protesters took a break to hear from the Rev. Molly Housh Gordon, a representative of Missouri Faith Voices, an organization which helped organize the day's activities.

"I believe that God created us all with dignity and worth and that all work and all people are worth a living wage that lets them put food on their tables and a roof over their heads," Housh Gordon said.

Dontay Tolston, 23, said he's been an employee at this Hardee's for 1 1/2 years. He likes his job as the night closing cook, and he even wore his black Hardee's cap to the rally. He started out working minimum wage, at least 40 hours a week. Recently, that changed.

"I got a raise not long ago, and ended up making less than I got before," Tolston said. His pay was raised to $8.40 an hour, he said, but his hours were cut to 30 a week. Often, he said, he gets assigned even less.

Tolston said those hours and his pay make it a struggle to meet his rent of $600 per month.

Unlike several other workers at the rally, Tolston was planning to work his shift later that night. Otherwise, he said, he wouldn't be able to pay his bills.

The heat of the noonday sun seemed to invigorate rather than slow down the group, which reassembled with more or less the same members a little before noon outside Taco Bell at 508 East Nifong Blvd.

"Dance to the left, dance to the right. Down with corporate greed!" yelled a man with a megaphone. The crowd enthusiastically played along, kicking their legs and laughing as they did the "corporate shuffle."

James Brown, 31, of Columbia joined in the fun, but he was there for a more serious reason. Brown said he's worked 35 hours per week as a crew trainer at this Taco Bell location for about a year, but his $7.50-an-hour wage doesn't cover living expenses for him and his 1-year-old son, Isiaha.

As a result, he's had to fall back on high-interest payday loans. Even then, Brown said, he's not sure how he'll pay the $360 it's going to take to fix his home air conditioner.

Brown had a message for his fellow fast-food employees who chose not to participate in the rallies today.

"I would like to tell each and every last worker in America that they should stand up for what's right," Brown said. "Come and be a part of this big movement."

A couple of minutes later, the group turned to face the Taco Bell, whose owner declined to comment, and chanted the same thing it had earlier.

"Come on out, we got your back! Come on out, we got your back!"

As the voices rose, a curious customer walked to the front entrance and took a picture of the group. No workers emerged.

By now, the restaurant was bustling. Car after car drove past the protesters and into the drive-thru lane near a message in large letters on the restaurant's sign: "Come try the new smothered burrito."

Brown found out about the rally from a co-worker, Cynthia Kronk, 19. They joined co-worker Unrica Parrow, 20, in holding a sign with the words, "Show Me Strike 4 $15."

Kronk said she makes $7.35 an hour and has worked at the store since March as a steamer. "I make everybody's food," she said.

Kronk has severe asthma and thinks that a $15 an hour wage would help her cover her medical bills. She hoped that Thursday's strike would lead to more in the future.

She and Parrow admitted that the prospect of a strike was frightening to many of their co-workers. Kronk mentioned two of her fellow employees who had told her they would come to the rally Thursday but didn't. Parrow said she talked to several people who were afraid to come.

Parrow, though, is adamant that their cause is just and worth the risk.

"We're not trying to make corporate owners upset at all," she said. "We just want to make them see what it's like to live in our shoes."

Around 12:15 p.m., the rallying workers and their supporters decided to call it quits for the day. Many planned to drive to St. Louis later Thursday afternoon to attend a rally there.

As Housh Gordon said earlier, "This is not the end; it's just the beginning."

Supervising editor is John Schneller.


Monday, August 26, 2013

RtW again?

The St. Louis Beason has a good story about the prospects of success for Right to Work for Less in Missouri: https://www.stlbeacon.org/#!/content/32356/onthetrail_rtw_analysis_senate. 

Sunday, August 25, 2013

STAND WITH PANERA WORKERS

St. Louis based Panera Bread has some explaining to do.  One update to this story: President Obama has appointed three new members to the NLRB, so Panera needs to get serious and negotiate with the elected exclusive representative of it's Michigan workers.

Stand with Panera: Workers Protest NLRB Nominations Confirmation Hold Up
Community members stand up for workplace rights

Michigan AFL-CIO,
June 21, 2013 by Elizabeth Battiste
 http://miaflcio.org/2013/06/stand-with-panera/

(KALAMAZOO, MI) – On Friday, June 21, workers and community members gathered outside of Panera Bread to protest the hold up of nominations to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) which has resulted in specific instances of workplace retaliation for union activity at Panera Bread locations owned by franchisee Bread of Life.
In 2012, Panera Bread bakers at cafes along the I-94 corridor in Michigan voted to join the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union (BCTGM). More than a year since they voted to form a union, workers are still waiting.
“Even though we voted to form a union last year, we still face a hostile work environment,” said Kathleen Von Eitzen a Panera worker at the Battle Creek location. “In order to rebuild our economy here in Michigan and level the playing field for working people across the country, we need an NLRB that works.”

The NLRB ruled that the company violated Federal Law by failing “to recognize and bargain with the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the unit.” The company appealed the decision to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. That court put the case on hold because its holding in another case throws into question the status of current Board members who were recess appointed by President Obama.
“I’m a customer service representative and CWA Local 4123 member, but I’m here to stand in solidarity with Panera workers and other workers who are facing these same fights every day,” said Annette Fox. “No one should fear retaliation from their employer for union activity. In fact, that’s illegal. I hope that the NLRB nominees are confirmed soon so that these workers can see justice upheld.”


One of the original Panera bakers has been fired by the company for his union activity, with little recourse due to the radical decision of the D.C. Circuit.
“I don’t want anyone else to have to go through what I am going through,” said Kyle Schilling, a union activist who was recently fired from a Kalamazoo Panera. “Justice delayed is justice denied.  The Senate must confirm the NLRB’s nominations so workers like me can get the justice we deserve.”
President Obama has nominated a bi-partisan package of nominees for the National Labor Relations Board. Without approval from the US Senate, the NLRB will be left without quorum to operate and make important decisions that affect workers every day.


Friday, August 16, 2013

Overtime is not answer, official says

Why don't Columbia city leaders understand that it would benefit everyone if they communicated with employee unions regularly.   Apparently the police chief and the city manager have not talked with the police association about using money saved from overtime to hire more officers.  Yet they say it won't work.  They should sit down to bargain in good faith with their officers.  Overtime may not be the entire answer, but if they listened to the association, they might find that it is part of the solution.

City staff still plans to pitch tax increase for hiring cops.

By ANDREW DENNEY and ALAN BURDZIAK
Thursday, August 15, 2013 at 2:00 pm

 Dale Roberts, the association's president, said yesterday the group isn't lobbying to eliminate police overtime completely, but a "tremendous cut" would be beneficial to officers who are stretched thin.

"The department has to have flexibility to have some overtime," Roberts said. He added that he has not discussed his pitch with Burton or City Manager Mike Matthes yet, but he has spoken with Burton before about overtime.

"We talked about looking at overtime as a measure as another way to demonstrate the need for officers," Roberts said. "That was the extent of it."


http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/local/overtime-is-not-answer-official-says/article_5574ca4c-05d0-11e3-a888-10604b9ffe60.html

Thursday, August 1, 2013

National Labor Board Shutdown Averted as Senate Approves New Members

Working In These Times
Wednesday Jul 31, 2013 11:29 am
By Bruce Vail
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday approved the nominations of five members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), averting a threatened shutdown of the agency amid continuing attacks by Republican Party lawmakers that the Obama-era NLRB is too pro-union.
The votes confirmed a deal struck earlier this month that saw Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) withdraw his threat to overhaul Senate filibuster rules in return for Republican agreement to allow confirmation of a small numbers of presidential appointments to federal agencies. Among the contested appointments approved under the deal were Thomas Perez as the new Secretary of the Department of Labor, four new members of the NLRB and the re-confirmation of the board’s current chairman Mark Gaston Pearce.
With the confirmations fight concluded for now, the NLRB can resume its role of enforcing federal collective bargaining law without fear of imminent shutdown. An estimated 80 million private sector workers are covered by the rules of the NLRB, which would have been forced to suspend normal operations next month when the expiration of Pearce’s original term of office threatened to leave the agency without the legally required quorum to issue decisions or enforce its orders.
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka applauded the confirmation votes, stating: “America’s working families applaud the Senate for confirming President Obama’s outstanding and highly qualified nominees to the National Labor Relations Board. This is the first time in more than a decade that the NLRB has been fully staffed. That is good news for all workers seeking to exercise the rights they are guaranteed by law. Those essential rights include the ability to bargain together for fair wages and living standards, and a workplace safe from abuse, harassment, and intimidation.”
“The challenge to this board is to go forward,” adds Larry Cohen, president of the Communications Workers of America (CWA), who was critical of the original deal. The NLRB is facing a number of difficult legal challenges inspired by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Cohen tells Working In These Times, and is certain to face continued hostile scrutiny from Republicans in Congress. “The Republican Party of today doesn’t seem to believe in the concept of any workers’ rights at all, so the NLRB is going to have to fight its way ahead every inch of the way,” Cohen predicts.
Proof of this was provided during the Tuesday Senate votes themselves, Cohen adds. Two key votes in the process were passed on margins of 54-44, with all Republicans voting against labor-supported NLRB candidates. “Nobody raised any objections to the qualifications, or to the quality, of these candidates. They [Republicans] voted against them just because they seem to be opposed to any enforcement of workers’ rights at all.”      
The Senate deal was marked by unprecedented swiftness in the appointment and confirmation of two of the new NLRB members—Kent Hirozawa and Nancy Schiffer. Obama named the two to the posts on July 16, a hurried confirmation hearing was held on July 23, and the final confirmation votes concluded on the evening of July 30. Quick action was part of the Democrat-Republican deal in the Senate, which included agreement by the Democrats to jettison sitting board members Richard R. Griffin Jr. and Sharon Block, both of whom had received controversial “recess appointments” from Obama early last year.
Both Hirozawa and Schiffer enjoyed labor support, and were the subjects of the Republican anti-labor votes referred to by CWA’s Cohen. Hirozawa is currently the top lawyer on the staff of the NLRB Chairman Pearce, and Schiffer is a retired lawyer for the AFL-CIO, with experience in her early career working for the United Auto Workers.
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), the top Republican on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee (HELP), had raised questions at the hearing last week as to whether the pro-labor credentials of the two would prevent then from treating employers fairly once they became NLRB members. He seemed to speak for most Republicans when he issued the following statement Tuesday:
I am voting against two of the nominees...and I want to explain why. One is Mr. Hirozawa and one is Miss Schiffer. Both of them have excellent legal backgrounds, but the problem is that I'm not persuaded—and I hope I will be proven wrong—that they're able to transfer their positions of advocacy to positions of judge, that they can be impartial when employers come before them.
The other two nominees approved Tuesday are experienced labor lawyers associated with large law firms that represent corporations in legal struggles against their own employees. They are Harry I. Johnson III, a partner in the firm Arent Fox, and Philip A. Miscimarra, of the firm Morgan, Lewis & Bockius. Both were approved on voice votes, with no Democratic Party opposition recorded.
The final element of the Senate NLRB deal will fall into place in September, when ex-member Griffin is expected to be confirmed as the new NLRB General Counsel, a position that also requires Senate confirmation, Cohen further reports.
Griffin, formerly the top lawyer of International Union of Operating Engineers, is slated to replace Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon, who was appointed to the post by Obama in 2010, but never confirmed. Early reports of Griffin’s new appointment provoked howls of outrage from some ultra-conservative groups, but Cohen says top Senate Republicans have quietly agreed to his confirmation sometime after Labor Day.
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), chairman of the HELP Committee, summed up Democratic Party frustration over NLRB appointment fights in a statement on Tuesday: “The time has come to start a new chapter for the NLRB. It’s time to ratchet down the political rhetoric that has recently haunted this agency, and let the dedicated public servants who work there do their jobs. Indeed, I hope today’s votes mark a new beginning for the Board. A revitalized NLRB is a critical part of our continued efforts to rebuild a strong economy and a strong middle class.”
United Auto Workers and the Communications Workers of America are sponsors of InTheseTimes.com.
Bruce Vail is a Baltimore-based freelance writer with decades of experience covering labor and business stories for newspapers, magazines and new media. He was a reporter for Bloomberg BNA's Daily Labor Report, covering collective bargaining issues in a wide range of industries, and a maritime industry reporter and editor for the Journal of Commerce, serving both in the newspaper's New York City headquarters and in the Washington, D.C. bureau.