Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Columbia mayoral candidates addressed overtime and job growth



COLUMBIA — On Monday night, members of the Mid-Missouri Labor Club questioned mayoral candidates about overtime pay, collective bargaining and council-manager government.

030810_LaborClub_Forum_03_t_w600_h600.jpg
It is the first time the Labor Club held such a meeting with mayoral candidates.
MoreStory


Related Media

Related Articles
Five of the six mayoral candidates were in attendance; candidate Sal Nuccio did not attend. Each had about 25 minutes to address the group of about 20 and answer questions.
Club members questioned Fourth Ward Councilman and mayoral candidate Jerry Wade’s City Council vote in September 2009 to restructure overtime hours for city workers.
“That decision last year is the single toughest decision I’ve made at City Council,” Wade said.
Wade added that when the city gets a “stable revenue stream” he wants to bring up the city workers at the bottom end of the salary scale.
During the meeting, James Turner, an MU employee, said Wade talked about overtime as if it was a gift.
Regina Guevara, a field representative with the Local 773 union, said she wasn’t happy with the way Wade voted on the overtime pay issue.
“He voted against the people,” she said. She added that understanding Wade as a potential mayor is easier because of his time on the council.
When asked about the council-manager form of government, candidate Sid Sullivan said the council shouldn’t be afraid to communicate with city workers when making policy decisions.
“As your mayor, I would certainly lead the charge in saying council has this authority,” Sullivan added.
When questioned about Boone Hospital Center construction projects, candidate Bob McDavid, who serves on the board of trustees at the hospital, said the board gives local preference when they can.
“We’re not going low bid, we’re going best bid,” he said.
McDavid also addressed the city’s relationship to MU during the question and answer session and said it was important to grow to attract people to the area.
Candidate Sean O’Day’s age was brought into question when Turner asked O’Day if he’d graduated yesterday. O’Day, 23, is the youngest candidate in the race. He is currently enrollyed at Moberly Area Community College.
“How do you expect to run a complex city like Columbia?” he added.
O’Day said he’d had been interested in politics for a long time and that he was very familiar with the issues facing the city.
Russ Unger, president of the club, asked O’Day if he supported issues especially important to the union workers, such as collective bargaining.
“Absolutely,” he said. “Workers have to be able to get together.”
Candidate Paul Love said programs would have to be cut because of city finances.
“Good, bad or otherwise, at least I’m being honest,” he said.
Love also said that he wanted to focus on bringing in high-technology jobs because “they just need people and power” and wouldn’t cause a lot of controversy.
Tim Nowlin, with the Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local 513 union, said there would be controversy if there were substandard wages, though.
“My face will be the first you’ll see out there with a sign around my neck,” Nowlin said.

Friday, March 5, 2010

Mayoral Candidates Interviews


At our meeting on Monday, March 8, 6:00 pm at the Columbia Labor Temple we have the opportunity to question the candidates for Mayor of Columbia.  These candidates will be there:

Jerry Wade
Bob McDavid
Sid Sullivan
Sean O'Day
Paul Love
 

Your Legislature at Work











It's always interesting to search for bills that our elected officials 
have introduced on labor issues.  HB 1960, the School Construction 
Act is sponsored by Rep.  Ruestman.The bill is scheduled for a 
hearing in the Special Standing Committee on Workforce 
Development and Workplace Safety (Rep. Stephen Webber 
is a member) on Monday, March 15 at noon.  This is very late in 
the session for a  House bill to get a House hearing,   so there is 
little chance the bill will pass.   It could be amended to a bill on 
the floor though, so pay attention!

This bill establishes the School Construction Act which exempts,
except in counties with a charter form of government, the
construction and maintenance work done for a school from the
prevailing hourly wage rate requirement upon the approval of the
school board.  If a school district exempts itself, it must
notify the Division of Labor Standards within the Department of
Labor and Industrial Relations of the exemption. 







REALLY BIG SALES TAX!


From the MNEA Legislative Update
by Otto Fajen

The Senate briefly debated Senate Joint Resolution 29 (Chuck Purgason) on March 4. Sen. Purgason offered a floor substitute that makes several changes, including adding exemptions for private schools, churches, motor fuel, insurance premiums and monetary donations to charities. SJR 29 is a proposed constitutional amendment which, if approved by a statewide vote, will replace the state personal and corporate income taxes, corporate and bank franchise taxes, existing state sales and use taxes and local earnings taxes with a greatly expanded and increased sales tax on most sales of goods and services. In a masterstroke of Orwellian deception, proponents refer to this massive sales tax increase as the “Fair Tax.”  

The state needs a responsible and sustainable tax policy to fund investment in public schools and other vital services. Perversely, the so-called “Fair Tax” proposal will actually make Missouri’s tax code profoundly less fair, less adequate and less sustainable. 

Missouri NEA strongly opposes this type of impractical, regressive tax change that will keep Missouri from maintaining the revenue it needs to invest in public schools, public higher education and other vital public services like healthcare. 

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Now Whirlpool Threatens Workers Who Protest Plant Closing


I found this amazing story at the Campaign for America's Future blog.  Not only is Whirlpool planning to close a plant in Indiana, throwing the union workers out of work.  Now they are threatening the "future employment opportunities" of the workers if they use their first amendment rights to protest the closing!  You can send a message to Whirlpool with the link at the bottom of the story.


Dave Johnson's picture

The other day I posted Whirlpool Bites Hands Of American Taxpayers That Feed Itsaying, in summary,
    • Whirlpool closes a plant in Evansville
    • Taxpayers will shoulder the unemployment and other costs.
    • All the local supplier, transportation and other third-party jobs are destroyed.
    • Even more home foreclosures in the area as a result.
    • Local businesses are stressed or have to go out of business.
    • They are playing nearby Iowa against Indiana for tax breaks and subsidies to keep just a few of the jobs.
    • Whirlpool is profiting from making all this someone else's problem.
    • And, of course, Wall Street celebrates the move.
A Whirlpool spokesperson responded, leading to the post, Whirlpool Exec Responds: The System Made Us Do It, taking a look at the bigger picture that forces our companies like Whirlpool to do these things that destroy people, communities and our economy,
"The spokesperson for Whirlpool is exactly right. It is the system that makes them do this. They are only following the market’s orders."
I thought that was the end of it, but whoa, what's this? Whirlpool Threatens Workers: Protesting Plant Closure Risks 'Future Jobs'
A major corporation planning to shut down a factory in Indiana has warned its union workers that they'll endanger their future job prospects if they protest the plant's closing.
. . . Activists planned a high-profile protest for this Friday, with AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka visiting the plant for the first time. But Whirlpool says the effort is futile -- they are fully committed to shutting the plant down. The company, however, still seems quite wary of the potential for bad publicity. In a memo sent to its employees and passed along to the Huffington Post, Paul Coburn, division vice president for Whirlpool's Evansville Division, offers a fairly explicit warning to his workers: If they join Trumka's protest they would seriously risk future employment opportunity.
Threatening workers who show up at the protest that they risk future employment?Click through to read the entire report and to see Whirlpool's letter.




Views expressed on this page are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Campaign for America's Future or Institute for America's Future